nonelvis: (Default)
nonelvis ([personal profile] nonelvis) wrote2008-07-26 12:00 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Posted mostly for [livejournal.com profile] toonhead_npl, but other font/design geeks should find this as fascinating as I did: Why the poster for Barack Obama's Berlin speech might have been banned by the Nazis. Not because of its content, but because of its typography.

[identity profile] fonticulus.livejournal.com 2008-07-26 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
That was a great post. I love stuff like that. And as someone who works in marketing, I have some awe for that kind of allegiance to a brand.

However, it's kind of hard to ignore the larger picture of how more than Obama's poster might have been in danger of "banning" under the Nazis.

[identity profile] mmancuso.livejournal.com 2008-07-26 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
it was forbidden to use modern design or sans-serif typefaces such as Futura, which Goebbels called a “Jewish invention.”

What is it with Jews lopping off bits others think are important?

[identity profile] profrobert.livejournal.com 2008-07-26 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
It's so you can see it better.

[identity profile] profrobert.livejournal.com 2008-07-26 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
That was fascinating. Thanks for the link.

[identity profile] toonhead-npl.livejournal.com 2008-07-27 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
VERY interesting but sweet Jebus I can't believe the people seeing Nazi design in this. Or maybe I can -- yikes.

another webpage that makes another point

[identity profile] toonhead-npl.livejournal.com 2008-07-27 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
http://www.towleroad.com/2008/07/obama-and-mccai.html