nonelvis: (DW science geeks)
nonelvis ([personal profile] nonelvis) wrote 2008-09-26 02:28 pm (UTC)

It's the pulling a number out of their ass bit I object to. I understand the financial issues here are massive, and there's no way Treasury would ever get a completely accurate figure. But before we commit to $700 billion in spending, shouldn't we at least try to get a better picture of what's going on? What if the right number is $200 billion? What if it's $1 trillion?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting