Who knew grammar was a fandom?
Jun. 6th, 2010 07:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I could have lived without the ableist insults, but the rest of this secret gets a big, fat HELL, YES from me. (Note that this is not my secret, but the original, TB!4 in this post, was too hard to read even at 100%, so I enlarged it.)
ETA: I should have added that the language used is NSFW, and that some people may find it offensive.
ETA: I should have added that the language used is NSFW, and that some people may find it offensive.
no subject
on 2010-06-06 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-06 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 07:03 am (UTC)I don't even know most of those stitches, but I'm going to try to learn them.
no subject
on 2010-06-07 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 04:45 pm (UTC)nonelvis will probably remember this: On one of the other boards we belong to, there was a woman (Lola? Lolita?) who used to write "site" and "lite" and "thru" and shit like that, and it drove everyone on the board crazy. No matter how many times she was corrected and asked not to do it, she would keep it up. She claimed they were accepted spellings because she had seen them in print. Eventually the boardrunner wrote a script so that every time she used one of those words, they would be replaced with "It's spelled L-I-G-H-T, Lola. LIGHT not LITE!" (depending on the word she used, of course).
I think she got banned eventually.
no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:25 pm (UTC)(I don't know about in the US, but in Canada, the food industry is only allowed to use the word "Light" if the product is significantly lower in calories or fat than the original product. Companies get around that by using "Lite" instead.)
no subject
on 2010-06-07 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 11:50 pm (UTC)(I'm Heather C on TUS, in case it wasn't obvious)
no subject
on 2010-06-08 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-08 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:58 am (UTC)I SAY AGAIN: YES!!
God, I wish I'd made that, myself. Whoever did clearly lives in my brain.
no subject
on 2010-06-07 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 04:22 pm (UTC)The one that's missing, which is really the worst, is "its," "it's," and -- God help me -- "its'."
no subject
on 2010-06-07 04:57 pm (UTC)Luckily, I am in a position to break that bad habit before it starts. I am an ESL teacher, and I tell my students that the apostrophe is for contractions and possession only. It's never for pluralization.
no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 05:21 pm (UTC)It worked in my high school English class, anyway. There were grumblings, but the teacher told the class that he was there to teach them how to use the language, so they could learn to do it right or fail.
no subject
on 2010-06-07 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-07 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-16 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-06-16 11:43 am (UTC)